ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Kazuki Hida, Sadao Kusuno, Takeshi Seino
Nuclear Technology | Volume 75 | Number 2 | November 1986 | Pages 148-159
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT86-A33857
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effects of 232U and 236U on uranium recycling in boiling water reactors are studied with the two-dimensional lattice physics code TGBLA. A simple analytic expression is proposed for reactivity compensation factor K, taking into account the self-shielding effect of resonance absorption in 236U: K = a + b/ (1 + ce6)1/2, where e6 denotes the 236U concentration. To output the same energy as the 3.0 wt% enrichment fuel free from 236U, the constants are determined to be a = 0.06, b = 0.23, and c = 1.9. The introduction of 1 ppb 232U increases the surface dose rate of the fuel assembly by 60% over the aged enriched natural uranium. Lead time is as important as cooling time in 232U production because of the presence of the chain that originates from the alpha decay of naturally occurring 234U. The natural uranium feed and the separative work requirement are evaluated on these bases, introducing typical recycling strategies, and it appears that uranium recycling saves 17 to 19% of the natural uranium but increases the separative work by 0 to 2%. The front-end cost analysis reveals the benefit of a concentrated utilization of reprocessed uranium, which results from the self-shielding effect of 236U and the assumption of a linear dependence of the front-end penalty on 232U concentration. Also studied are plutonium composition in irradiated fuels and the effects of extended burnup.