ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
Kazuki Hida, Sadao Kusuno, Takeshi Seino
Nuclear Technology | Volume 75 | Number 2 | November 1986 | Pages 148-159
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT86-A33857
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effects of 232U and 236U on uranium recycling in boiling water reactors are studied with the two-dimensional lattice physics code TGBLA. A simple analytic expression is proposed for reactivity compensation factor K, taking into account the self-shielding effect of resonance absorption in 236U: K = a + b/ (1 + ce6)1/2, where e6 denotes the 236U concentration. To output the same energy as the 3.0 wt% enrichment fuel free from 236U, the constants are determined to be a = 0.06, b = 0.23, and c = 1.9. The introduction of 1 ppb 232U increases the surface dose rate of the fuel assembly by 60% over the aged enriched natural uranium. Lead time is as important as cooling time in 232U production because of the presence of the chain that originates from the alpha decay of naturally occurring 234U. The natural uranium feed and the separative work requirement are evaluated on these bases, introducing typical recycling strategies, and it appears that uranium recycling saves 17 to 19% of the natural uranium but increases the separative work by 0 to 2%. The front-end cost analysis reveals the benefit of a concentrated utilization of reprocessed uranium, which results from the self-shielding effect of 236U and the assumption of a linear dependence of the front-end penalty on 232U concentration. Also studied are plutonium composition in irradiated fuels and the effects of extended burnup.