ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE issues new NEPA rule and procedures—and accelerates DOME reactor testing
Meeting a deadline set in President Trump’s May 23 executive order “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” the DOE on June 30 updated information on its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rulemaking and implementation procedures and published on its website an interim final rule that rescinds existing regulations alongside new implementing procedures.
Siegfried Langenbuch, Klaus-Dieter Schmidt, Kiril Velkov
Nuclear Technology | Volume 142 | Number 2 | May 2003 | Pages 124-136
Technical Paper | OECD/NRC MSLB Benchmark | doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3378
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Pressurized Water Reactor Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) Benchmark has been calculated for all three exercises by the coupled code system ATHLET-QUABOX/CUBBOX developed by Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS). The results obtained are presented, and a detailed comparison with other solutions of the benchmark is discussed. An attempt is made to explain the differences observed in the solutions by the different modeling of physical processes in the codes. The sensitivity of results on modeling features is also investigated. In addition, the effect of different mapping schemes between fuel assemblies of the core loading and the thermal-fluid dynamics on the accuracy of three-dimensional (3-D) neutronics solutions is studied. The results for the MSLB transient are also evaluated to compare 3-D neutronics and point-kinetics solutions in view of integral and local parameters. Thus, the experiences with the coupled code system ATHLET-QUABOX/CUBBOX during the MSLB benchmark activity are summarized.
