ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Siegfried Langenbuch, Klaus-Dieter Schmidt, Kiril Velkov
Nuclear Technology | Volume 142 | Number 2 | May 2003 | Pages 124-136
Technical Paper | OECD/NRC MSLB Benchmark | doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3378
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Pressurized Water Reactor Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) Benchmark has been calculated for all three exercises by the coupled code system ATHLET-QUABOX/CUBBOX developed by Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS). The results obtained are presented, and a detailed comparison with other solutions of the benchmark is discussed. An attempt is made to explain the differences observed in the solutions by the different modeling of physical processes in the codes. The sensitivity of results on modeling features is also investigated. In addition, the effect of different mapping schemes between fuel assemblies of the core loading and the thermal-fluid dynamics on the accuracy of three-dimensional (3-D) neutronics solutions is studied. The results for the MSLB transient are also evaluated to compare 3-D neutronics and point-kinetics solutions in view of integral and local parameters. Thus, the experiences with the coupled code system ATHLET-QUABOX/CUBBOX during the MSLB benchmark activity are summarized.
