ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Franklyn M. Clikeman, Sai-Chi Mo, Karl O. Ott, Gary Alan Harms, H. P. Chou, R. H. Johnson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 341-352
Technical Paper | Analyse | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33731
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Six capture rates, five fission rates, and one inelastic scattering rate have been measured as a function of radius in the blanket of the Fast Breeder Blanket Facility, a facility designed to simulate the transport of neutrons in fast reactor blankets. The measured reaction rates were compared with the reaction rates obtained from a typical two-dimensional calculation. The calculated reaction rates agree well with the measurements at the inside of the blanket but diverge from the measurements with increasing blanket penetration. Two effects were found to account for all of the differences between the calculated and measured reaction rates. First, a quantity approximately equal to the neutron number density decreases more rapidly across the blanket in the calculations than the measurements would indicate. Second, a self-shielding transition effect was noticeable around the converter/blanket interface. Furthermore, a mutual shielding effect between 238U cross-section resonances and detector foil resonances caused additional differences between the measurements and calculations of three capture rates for materials commonly used in neutron dosimetry experiments. The experimental techniques and the results of the reaction rate measurements are presented in detail, including a theoretical foil correction (by means of integral transport theory) that replaces the previously used experimental correction. This work completes and complements earlier experiments, comparisons, and interpretations.