ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
From operator to entrepreneur: David Garcia applies outage management lessons
David Garcia
If ComEd’s Zion plant in northern Illinois hadn’t closed in 1998, David Garcia might still be there, where he got his start in nuclear power as an operator at age 24.
But in his ninth year working there, Zion closed, and Garcia moved on to a series of new roles—including at Wisconsin’s Point Beach plant, the corporate offices of Minnesota’s Xcel Energy, and on the supplier side at PaR Nuclear—into an on-the-job education that he augmented with degrees in business and divinity that he sought later in life.
Garcia started his own company—Waymaker Resource Group—in 2014. Recently, Waymaker has been supporting Holtec’s restart project at the Palisades plant with staffing and analysis. Palisades sits almost exactly due east of the fully decommissioned Zion site on the other side of Lake Michigan and is poised to operate again after what amounts to an extended outage of more than three years. Holtec also plans to build more reactors at the same site.
For Garcia, the takeaway is clear: “This industry is not going away. Nuclear power and the adjacent industries that support nuclear power—and clean energy, period—are going to be needed for decades upon decades.”
In July, Garcia talked with Nuclear News staff writer Susan Gallier about his career and what he has learned about running successful outages and other projects.
Mario Dalle Donne, Ulrich Fischer, Marko Küchle
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 15-28
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33707
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A conceptual design of a helium-cooled blanket that satisfies the boundary conditions specified by the Next European Torus team is presented. The first wall is made of austenitic stainless steel with poloidally running helium cooling tubes and a 10-mm-thick steel erosion layer. The breeding material is lithium orthosilicate (Li4SiO4) with 60% 6Li enrichment and it is contained in the form of 2-mm pebbles in a bed together with 2-mm beryllium particles. Zirconium hydride is used in the back of the blanket to improve the tritium breeding. The main helium cooling system and the helium purge system for the tritium extraction are both at 80 bar, but they are completely separate for tritium-control reasons. An oxidizing atmosphere in the helium purge system ensures that the tritium losses from the plant are <10 Ci/day. The tritium inventory in the blanket is mainly due to tritium adsorption on the surface of the ceramic material. It is <1000 g, provided that the specific surface of the ceramic material is <0.25 m2/g. The rather leaky structure provided by the poloidally running breeder tubes is the main reason for the rather modest tritium breeding ratio. Improvement of the breeding ratio could be obtained by using a high melting point multiplier (beryllium or Zr5Pb3) in the first-wall region. This would also have the advantage of increasing the inlet helium temperature in the blanket region. The helium temperature resulting from the present design would allow a plant efficiency comparable to that of a pressurized water reactor. A higher plant efficiency would require the use of a more advanced structural material than austenitic stainless steel.