ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
Martin Victor Polley
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 3 | December 1985 | Pages 557-567
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33678
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is widely experienced that operation with a low primary coolant pHT leads to heavy deposition on fuel-pin cladding in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). This is thought to be due principally to solubilities of corrosion products exhibiting negative temperature dependencies at low coolant pHT, leading to precipitation from the solution onto core surfaces. Solubilities also increase at low pHT values and this may be an additional reason for the increased deposition. Particulate deposition may also depend on coolant pHT. Operation at low coolant pHT may thus cause increased corrosion product activity transport, leading to higher dose rates around the primary circuit. The possible correlation between low pHT operation and steam generator channel head dose rates was investigated, using detailed data from nine Westinghouse PWRs. The coolant chemistry was quantified by calculating both the percentage of operating time at low pHT and a numerical “precipitation index” in order to establish the extent of operation below that coolant pHT above which little core crud deposition is expected. Time averaged pH’s were also calculated for each cycle. End-of-cycle dose rates were plotted against these coolant chemistry parameters on a plantby-plant basis and statistical tests were applied following linear regression analysis. Positive correlations were obtained and it was found that, for the limited number of plants in the survey, these correlations were between the categories “significant” and “probably significant” for cycle 1 and cycle 2 data.