ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
Richard F. Farman, Charles E. Hendrix, Jason Chao
Nuclear Technology | Volume 70 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 84-93
Technical Paper | Third International Retran Meeting / Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33666
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two simulations of pressurized water reactor (PWR) anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) sequences were performed in the loss-of-fluid test (LOFT) facility. These were designated as tests L9-3 and L9-4. Test L9-3 is a loss-of-feedwater transient, while L9-4 simulates an ATWS accompanied by loss of off-site power. In the latter case, the main steam valve and primary circulation pumps are tripped at the beginning of the experiment, along with the steam generator feedwater flow. The behavior of these experiments was analyzed with the RETRAN-02 computer code in order to evaluate the capability of the code to predict A TWS behavior against the experimental evidence exhibited by LOFT. The complex sequence of events, which occurs in L9-3, creates a difficult system modeling problem. The primary influence on the entire system response is the steam generator heat transfer rate (given core power as a boundary condition). Results of the analysis demonstrate how the course of the computer calculation is influenced by the steam generator model and its initial conditions. Test L9-4 does not contain the thermal-hydraulic complexity of test L9-3 due to the immediate isolation of the steam generator. Nonetheless, it reinforces the general conclusion that RETRAN-02 will produce an adequate simulation of PWR ATWS behavior if the initial and boundary conditions are completely defined.