ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
Leonhard Meyer, Mireia G. Gargallo
Nuclear Technology | Volume 141 | Number 3 | March 2003 | Pages 257-274
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3366
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were performed in a scaled annular cavity design, to investigate melt dispersal from the reactor pit when the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) lower head fails at low system pressure of less than 2 MPa. The fluid dynamics of the dispersion process was studied using model fluids, water, or bismuth alloy instead of corium, and nitrogen or helium instead of steam. The effects of different breach sizes and locations and different failure pressures on the dispersion were studied, specifically by testing central holes, lateral holes, horizontal rips, and complete unzipping of the bottom head.With holes at the base of the bottom head, the most important parameters governing the dispersion of melt are the hole size and the burst pressure. The fraction dispersed into the reactor compartments increases with larger holes and higher pressures. Values up to 76% have been found for both melt simulant liquids, water, and metal. With lateral breaches the liquid height in the lower head relative to the upper and lower edge of the breach is an additional parameter for the dispersion process, and usually not all the liquid is discharged out of the RPV. The liquid fraction entrained out of the RPV can be higher with a small breach than with a large one because of the longer blowdown time. With lateral failures, maximum dispersed fractions of 50% were found with water as melt simulant and less than 1% with liquid metal. It follows from similarity considerations that the results from the liquid metal tests represent the lower bound for the dispersed melt fractions; however, they are probably closer to the expected values than the results from the water tests, which represent the upper bound. So, significantly less dispersion of melt can be expected for lateral breaches at pressures below 2 MPa, probably less than 10%. If higher dispersion occurs, due to higher pressure at failure or with failures near the bottom center, simple devices to reduce the dispersion out of the cavity may be feasible.