ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Findings of the ANS Executive Order Expert Advisory Group
On May 23, President Donald Trump signed four Executive Orders (EOs) designed to “usher in a nuclear energy renaissance” by building on federal policies and programs and directing efficiencies in the licensing, siting, development, and deployment of advanced reactor technologies.
In order to evaluate the specific proposals contained in the EOs, a group of experts was convened from various sectors of the U.S. nuclear technology enterprise, under the auspices of the ANS External Affairs Committee, to compare the EOs against existing ANS board-approved Position Statements and to offer constructive input for subsequent implementation by the Trump administration.
The group’s findings and feedback, which were delivered by ANS CEO Craig Piercy to ANS President Lisa Marshall and the Board of Directors, are listed below, grouped by individual EO.
Leonhard Meyer, Mireia G. Gargallo
Nuclear Technology | Volume 141 | Number 3 | March 2003 | Pages 257-274
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3366
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were performed in a scaled annular cavity design, to investigate melt dispersal from the reactor pit when the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) lower head fails at low system pressure of less than 2 MPa. The fluid dynamics of the dispersion process was studied using model fluids, water, or bismuth alloy instead of corium, and nitrogen or helium instead of steam. The effects of different breach sizes and locations and different failure pressures on the dispersion were studied, specifically by testing central holes, lateral holes, horizontal rips, and complete unzipping of the bottom head.With holes at the base of the bottom head, the most important parameters governing the dispersion of melt are the hole size and the burst pressure. The fraction dispersed into the reactor compartments increases with larger holes and higher pressures. Values up to 76% have been found for both melt simulant liquids, water, and metal. With lateral breaches the liquid height in the lower head relative to the upper and lower edge of the breach is an additional parameter for the dispersion process, and usually not all the liquid is discharged out of the RPV. The liquid fraction entrained out of the RPV can be higher with a small breach than with a large one because of the longer blowdown time. With lateral failures, maximum dispersed fractions of 50% were found with water as melt simulant and less than 1% with liquid metal. It follows from similarity considerations that the results from the liquid metal tests represent the lower bound for the dispersed melt fractions; however, they are probably closer to the expected values than the results from the water tests, which represent the upper bound. So, significantly less dispersion of melt can be expected for lateral breaches at pressures below 2 MPa, probably less than 10%. If higher dispersion occurs, due to higher pressure at failure or with failures near the bottom center, simple devices to reduce the dispersion out of the cavity may be feasible.