ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Yuichi Yamane, Yoshinori Miyoshi, Shouichi Watanabe, Toshihiro Yamamoto
Nuclear Technology | Volume 141 | Number 3 | March 2003 | Pages 221-232
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3363
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The third series of the critical experiments on 10% enriched uranyl nitrate solution has been performed at the Static Experiment Critical Facility (STACY) of the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute. Water-reflected and unreflected 80-cm-diam cylindrical cores were used to obtain the systematic data of critical solution height and differential reactivity for various uranium concentrations from 190 to 240 g/l. The numerically evaluated extrapolation length of neutron flux distribution was in good agreement with the experimental result. The effective neutron multiplication factor keff for each core configuration and the effect of uncertainties on keff were also numerically evaluated with both the detailed experimental configuration of critical cores and a benchmark model provided for the validation of nuclear calculation codes. The MCNP 4B was used for the evaluation calculations with JENDL-3.2 cross-section library, and the value of the keff of the benchmark model was reproduced within the difference of 0.05% keff for the water-reflector cores and 0.17% keff for the unreflected cores.