ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Douglas J. Rzepecki
Nuclear Technology | Volume 69 | Number 3 | June 1985 | Pages 279-292
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33611
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The time-dependent radiation transport for a demonstration scale liquid-metal-cooled fast breeder reactor that has undergone a severe loss of sodium coolant is calculated with both a discrete ordinates and a diffusion theory solution for the real neutron flux shape. It is found that diffusion theory underpredicts reactivity levels by about $6 when compared to discrete ordinates. It is also found that the use of an initial adjoint neutron flux throughout the transient as a reactivity weighting function could seriously underpredict reactivity levels for a severely degraded reactor core. In both cases, there was an immediate termination of the excursion. The uncertainty of being limited to two fuel fields for an end of equilibrium cycle reactor core in SIMMER-II during the transient was greater than that due to microscopic cross-section shielding factor iteration and interpolation schemes. Fifty-energy-group reactivity coefficients were best duplicated in collapsing to a ten-energy-group set with an entire reactor integrated bilinear neutron energy flux spectrum.