ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Willem L. Zijp, Éva M. Zsolnay, Henk J. Nolthenius, Egon J. Szondi, Gerardus C. H. M. Verhaag
Nuclear Technology | Volume 67 | Number 2 | November 1984 | Pages 282-301
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT84-A33517
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The aim of the interlaboratory REAL-80 exercise, organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency, was to determine the state of the art in 1981 of the capabilities of laboratories to adjust neutron spectrum information on the basis of a set of experimental activation rates, and to subsequently predict the number of displacements in steel, together with its uncertainty. The input information distributed to participating laboratories comprised values, variances, and covariances for a set of input fluence rates, for a set of activation and damage cross-section data, and for a set of experimentally measured reaction rates. The exercise dealt with two clearly different spectra: the thermal Oak Ridge Research Reactor (ORR) spectrum and the fast YAYOI spectrum. Out of 30 laboratories asked to participate, 13 laboratories contributed 33 solutions for ORR and 35 solutions for YAYOI. The spectral shapes of the solution spectra showed considerable spread, both for the ORR and YAYOI spectra. When the series of predicted activation rates in nickel and the predicted displacement rates in steel derived for all solutions is considered, one cannot observe significant differences due to the adjustment algorithm used. The largest deviations seem to be due to effects related to group structure and/or changes in the input data. When comparing the predicted activation rate in nickel with its available measured value, we observe that the predicted value (averaged over all solutions) is lower than the measured value.