ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
Yi-Chiang Chang, Alexander Sesonske
Nuclear Technology | Volume 65 | Number 2 | May 1984 | Pages 292-304
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT84-A33412
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Low-leakage extended burnup fuel management is a promising pressurized water reactor (PWR) improvement that yields better neutron economy than the traditional out-in fuel management scheme with resulting economic savings and a likely reduction in vessel fast neutron fluence. The Commonwealth Edison Zion-1 reactor was selected as representative of current operating PWRs and analyzed. A major objective was to develop and analyze optimum transition loading arrangements leading from present out-in management to the desired low-leakage scheme. A so-called “wet” burnable poison was used in the calcula-tional model, which was based on various Electric Power Research Institute/Advanced Recycle Methodology Program modules. An accelerated direct search scheme was developed to optimize the loading pattern utilizing the initial boron concentration as the objective function, which would correspond to a maximum cycle length for a given number of loaded fresh assemblies. The equilibrium cycle, with 32 of 48 fresh assemblies loaded in the core interior, resulted in a 6.4% saving in fuel cycle costs compared with a three-batch out-in strategy, and a 3.8% saving compared with a four-batch out-in strategy. Therefore, the low-leakage option is a promising improvement and detailed design is justified.