ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NuScale Energy Exploration Center opens at George Mason University
NuScale Power Corporation has opened another Energy Exploration (E2) Center—this one at George Mason University in Arlington, Va. Just last month, a NuScale E2 Center opened at South Carolina State University in Orangeburg, S.C. The newest E2 at George Mason is the company’s 11th center.
Karl Hornyik
Nuclear Technology | Volume 61 | Number 2 | May 1983 | Pages 296-312
Technical Paper | Second International RETRAN Meeting / Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33198
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A RETRAN model was developed for determining the stability of boiling water reactors operating with high power/flow ratios. This model was applied to Peach Bottom 2 and compared with the stability tests conducted at the end of fuel cycle 2. Because of the deterministic nature of the RETRAN model, it appears logical to select those transients produced by periodic setpoint switching rather than those where pseudorandom switching was employed. Comparisons were made in both the time domain and the frequency domain between the computed equilibrium cycle and a measured equilibrium cycle obtained as an average over a large number of cycles. The variables of interest are the system pressure measured in the steam dome and the average neutron flux measured by an average power range monitor. Comparisons in the time domain were adversely affected by an apparent, strong nonlinearity in the pressure controller and/or turbine control valve response. Since this effect could neither be identified nor appropriately simulated, a second model was developed, for which the measured system pressure is specified as time-dependent volume condition. The equivalence of these two models with regard to the pressure-to-flux transfer function was established. This provides the justification for using any arbitrary, simple pressure perturbation of the second model to determine this transfer function, which is commonly used to provide a measure of stability. Sensitivity studies revealed three groups of parameters with a strong influence on stability as well as the nature of this influence. These parameters are related to: heat conduction from the fuel pellet and through the helium-filled gap, the axial power profile, and the moderator feedback of reactivity. The choice of two-phase flow model also was shown to be very important; a case using the homogeneous equilibrium model option resulted in diverging oscillations, while corresponding calculations with the algebraic slip model exhibited considerable damping similar to that observed in the measured response.
