ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
Weaver NRC reappointment gets OK, Senate vote next
The U.S. Senate’s Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee has recommended Douglas Weaver be reappointed to a full five-year term on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission after his current term expires on June 30.
The committee voted 15-4 in support of Weaver’s nomination on Wednesday, clearing the way for a final vote on the Senate floor. If the Senate votes to confirm Weaver, he would serve on the NRC through June 30, 2031.
John Brian Ainscough*, David Norman Coucill, David Anthony Howl, Arne Jensen, Ib Misfeldt
Nuclear Technology | Volume 61 | Number 3 | June 1983 | Pages 521-532
Technical Paper | New Directions in Nuclear Energy with Emphasis on Fuel Cycles / Economic | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33177
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Duplex UO2 pellets, which consist of an outer enriched annulus and a depleted or natural core, can provide a solution to the problem of stress corrosion cracking failures, which have led to constraints being placed on ramp rates in power reactors. An analysis of the reactor physics and the performance of duplex pellets is presented in the context of a 17 × 17 pressurized water reactor fuel rod design. The study has been based on the particular type of duplex pellet in which the core and the annulus are physically separate; this is called “LOWI” after the Danish design. At low bumup, this fuel shows a significant improvement in power ramp performance compared with standard fuel. At higher bumup, the benefits are less certain but as the severity of the ramp will usually be less in high bumup fuel simply because of the reduced rating, the reduction in benefit may not be significant. If the gap between the core and annulus persists to high bumup, there will be no loss of benefit. Economic calculations and a cost-benefit analysis are presented to show the number of extra full-power hours of reactor operation that must be obtained in order to outweigh the additional fabrication costs associated with this fuel.