ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
Weaver NRC reappointment gets OK, Senate vote next
The U.S. Senate’s Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee has recommended Douglas Weaver be reappointed to a full five-year term on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission after his current term expires on June 30.
The committee voted 15-4 in support of Weaver’s nomination on Wednesday, clearing the way for a final vote on the Senate floor. If the Senate votes to confirm Weaver, he would serve on the NRC through June 30, 2031.
Klaus Penndorf, Frank Schult, Dietrich BüNemann
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 2 | November 1982 | Pages 256-269
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33029
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Maximum conversion ratios of Pu/U mixtures in a pressurized water reactor (PWR)-like open rod lattice core are assessed complying with established data of thermal design, allowing for agreeable discharge burnup values, and utilizing plutonium from PWRs with present time fuel management or with that expected for the near future. Void reactivity, temperature coefficients, and control rod requirements are discussed with respect to their compatibility with the usual PWR design principles. While the temperature coefficients show a completely satisfying behavior, the core control requirements lead to design inconveniences, which nevertheless can be overcome. A crucial constraint, however, is the void reactivity, which limits the specific plutonium content. From the economical point of view, high conversion fuel cycles are penalized by high fissile inventories but promoted by low net consumption of fissile material as well as by low specific reprocessing expenditures.