ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2024
Latest News
Proposed rule for more flexible licensing under Part 53 is open for comment
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published a proposed rule that has been five years in the making: Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors. The rule, which by law must take its final form before the end of 2027, would let the NRC and license applicants use technology-inclusive approaches and risk-informed, performance-based techniques to effectively license any nuclear technology. This is a departure from two licensing options with light water reactor–specific regulatory requirements that applicants can already choose.
Edgar Kiefhaber
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 3 | December 1982 | Pages 483-493
Technical Paper | The Backfill as an Engineered Barrier for Radioactive Waste Management / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33006
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Steam ingress into a gas-cooled fast reactor (GCFR) core may lead to reactivity effects that are undesirable from the point of view of reactor safety. Unfortunately, the amount of reactivity increase caused by a certain steam concentration is usually subject to considerable uncertainty, as has become evident by occasional comparisons between various laboratories for specific examples. Therefore, some time ago, a series of intentionally simple benchmarks were proposed in order to study in a systematic way the calculational uncertainty of the steam ingress reactivity arising essentially from differences in the nuclear data basis used at various laboratories. The analysis of corresponding results provided by laboratories in France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, and the United States reveals that there still exist appreciable deviations in the predicted steam ingress reactivity effect. Due to the extensive cancellation of positive and negative contributions to this reactivity effect, the resulting net value is extremely sensitive to deviations in the nuclear data and calculational methods. Typical discrepancies for the calculated steam ingress reactivity observed within the framework of an international intercomparison are described, leading to the conclusion that further improvements in the nuclear data basis are desirable and the development and application of fairly refined calculational methods is mandatory to be able to predict the corresponding effect with sufficient reliability for related power reactor designs. In addition, measurements of equivalent reactivity effects should be continued in different critical assemblies to provide a broader experimental basis for the verification of the calculational tools. If further analytical work could be pursued, the Argonne National Laboratory experiment on the GCFR Phase II Steam Entry Effect might be the appropriate object to be studied and analyzed in detail, e.g., by a similar intercomparison effort, especially if the discrepancies existing at present in nuclear data bases could be removed or diminished to a tolerable level. Reasonable progress in these areas would increase the confidence attributed to calculations of the reactivity effect of the assumed entry of hydrogeneous material into the core of a fast power reactor.