ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
Weaver NRC reappointment gets OK, Senate vote next
The U.S. Senate’s Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee has recommended Douglas Weaver be reappointed to a full five-year term on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission after his current term expires on June 30.
The committee voted 15-4 in support of Weaver’s nomination on Wednesday, clearing the way for a final vote on the Senate floor. If the Senate votes to confirm Weaver, he would serve on the NRC through June 30, 2031.
Edgar Kiefhaber
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 3 | December 1982 | Pages 483-493
Technical Paper | The Backfill as an Engineered Barrier for Radioactive Waste Management / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33006
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Steam ingress into a gas-cooled fast reactor (GCFR) core may lead to reactivity effects that are undesirable from the point of view of reactor safety. Unfortunately, the amount of reactivity increase caused by a certain steam concentration is usually subject to considerable uncertainty, as has become evident by occasional comparisons between various laboratories for specific examples. Therefore, some time ago, a series of intentionally simple benchmarks were proposed in order to study in a systematic way the calculational uncertainty of the steam ingress reactivity arising essentially from differences in the nuclear data basis used at various laboratories. The analysis of corresponding results provided by laboratories in France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, and the United States reveals that there still exist appreciable deviations in the predicted steam ingress reactivity effect. Due to the extensive cancellation of positive and negative contributions to this reactivity effect, the resulting net value is extremely sensitive to deviations in the nuclear data and calculational methods. Typical discrepancies for the calculated steam ingress reactivity observed within the framework of an international intercomparison are described, leading to the conclusion that further improvements in the nuclear data basis are desirable and the development and application of fairly refined calculational methods is mandatory to be able to predict the corresponding effect with sufficient reliability for related power reactor designs. In addition, measurements of equivalent reactivity effects should be continued in different critical assemblies to provide a broader experimental basis for the verification of the calculational tools. If further analytical work could be pursued, the Argonne National Laboratory experiment on the GCFR Phase II Steam Entry Effect might be the appropriate object to be studied and analyzed in detail, e.g., by a similar intercomparison effort, especially if the discrepancies existing at present in nuclear data bases could be removed or diminished to a tolerable level. Reasonable progress in these areas would increase the confidence attributed to calculations of the reactivity effect of the assumed entry of hydrogeneous material into the core of a fast power reactor.