ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
Alan P. Main, Bryce L. Shriver
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 3 | December 1982 | Pages 456-462
Technical PaperTechnical Paper | The Backfill as an Engineered Barrier for Radioactive Waste Management / Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33003
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A model for predicting the annealing response of A553-B weld materials has been developed. This model assumes that the irradiation-induced shifts in the nil ductility transition temperature (ΔNDTT) and Charpy upper shelf energy (ΔUSE) are a result of the introduction of three types of defects into the alloy. The recovery of ΔNDTT and ΔUSE depends on the concentration of each defect remaining after the annealing treatment. The three defect types, including their diffusion constants, are assumed to be the same for all A533-B welds. However, the contribution of each defect type to ΔNDTT and ΔUSE depends on the chemical composition of the material and possibly the neutron fluence. Copper, nickel, manganese, and chromium were found to correlate with ΔNDTT, while sulfur and phosphorus appeared to correlate with ΔUSE. Once the relative contribution of each defect type is known, the recovery of ΔNDTT and ΔUSE is predicted based on diffusion calculations. Both the annealing temperature and time are accounted for in the calculations. The final model was compared with experimental data on three materials tested by Westinghouse Electric Corporation and two materials tested by the Naval Research Laboratory. The model accurately predicted the recovery of ΔNDTT for all five materials annealed at 343°C (650°F) to 454°C (850°F) for 24 to 336 h. The predicted recovery of ΔUSE was not as accurate as that of ΔNDTT.