ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Isolation asks states to include waste disposal in their nuclear strategy
Nuclear waste disposal technology company Deep Isolation is asking that the National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) consider how spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste will be managed under its strategy for developing advanced nuclear power projects in participating states.
Alex Galperin, Yigal Ronen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 58 | Number 3 | September 1982 | Pages 388-396
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A32974
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Received November 3, 1981 Accepted for Publication March 22, 1982 A symbiotic system of Pu-Th- and 233U-U-fueled reactors has been proposed and analyzed. The Pu-Th reactors utilize a tight lattice core and the 233U-U reactors utilize a regular pressurized water reactor (PWR) core. The two cases were investigated with different Pu-Th cores (system A: VM/VF =0.4 and system B: VM/VF - 1.0) and similar 233U-U cores. The cumulative 30-yr requirements of uranium ore and separative work for both systems were evaluated and indicated significant savings compared to current PWRs with plutonium recycle and the cross-progeny fuel cycle. The fuel cycle costs calculated for the proposed systems were slightly higher than those for the current PWR cycle.
