ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Meeting Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
The U.S. Million Person Study of Low-Dose-Rate Health Effects
There is a critical knowledge gap regarding the health consequences of exposure to radiation received gradually over time. While there is a plethora of studies on the risks of adverse outcomes from both acute and high-dose exposures, including the landmark study of atomic bomb survivors, these are not characteristic of the chronic exposure to low-dose radiation encountered in occupational and public settings. In addition, smaller cohorts have limited numbers leading to reduced statistical power.
D. D. Lanning
Nuclear Technology | Volume 56 | Number 3 | March 1982 | Pages 565-574
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A32915
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Thermally induced cracking of the UO2 fuel pellets undoubtedly results in some reduction of the effective fuel thermal conductivity, relative to that for solid UO2. This effect may be approximated by appropriately chosen “crack factors” that reduce the solid-UO2 thermal conductivity. We demonstrate that the assumption of reduced fuel conductivity always results in a reduction of the fuel stored energy that is inferred from fuel centerline temperature data. This reduction occurs whether the crack factors are introduced as simple constants or as functions of radial position within the fuel pellet. If fuel performance computer codes remain “tuned” to the current body of centerline temperature data, those codes will predict lower fuel stored energy when fuel cracking is taken into account regardless of the modeling assumptions invoked. Accounting for fuel cracking should lead to a reduction in calculated peak cladding temperatures obtained in some loss-of-coolant accident simulations.