ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
Richard Simms, George S. Stanford, Charles L. Fink, James P. Regis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 55 | Number 3 | December 1981 | Pages 594-600
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32804
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactivity feedback from fuel relocation is a central issue in the analysis of a loss-of-flow (LOF) accident in a liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR). Fuel relocation has been the subject of a number of LOF simulations in the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT). In this study, the results of these tests are analyzed using, as the principal figure of merit, the changes in equivalent fuel worth associated with the fuel motion. The equivalent fuel worth was obtained from the measured axial fuel distributions by weighting the data with a typical LMFBR fuel worth function. At nominal power, the initial fuel relocation resulted in increases in equivalent fuel worth. Above nominal power, the fuel motion was mildly dispersive, but the dispersive driving forces could not unequivocally be identified.