ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
Richard Simms, Stephen M. Gehl, Robert K. Lo, Alan B. Rothman
Nuclear Technology | Volume 52 | Number 2 | February 1981 | Pages 228-245
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32667
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Test L5 simulated a hypothetical fast test reactor (FTR) loss-of-flow (LOF) accident using three (Pu,U)O2 fuel elements. The test elements were irradiated at 40 kW/m before Transient Reactor Test Facility Test L5 in the General Electric Test Reactor to 8 at.% burnup. The active fuel column length of the test elements was ∼50 mm shorter than the active length for the FTR. The test elements had a fuel microstructure approximating moderate-power-structure FTR fuel In the LOF accident sequence for the FTR, fuel slumping in the high-power subassemblies causes a power excursion. Test L5 examined the fuel motion for conditions associated with the moderate-power FTR subassemblies in the accident. Dispersals of moderate-power fuel can reduce the accident severity. Data from test vehicle sensors, fuel motion detectors, and a post-test examination were used to reconstruct the sequence of events within the test zone. The test data indicated that a fuel dispersal occurred after reaching a peak power of six-times nominal The fuel motion was apparently driven by the release of fission-product gases entrained in the fuel matrix, since a fuel-vapor-pressure driving force was not significant in this test. The fuel remains showed a range of microstructural changes which were especially useful in inferring the sequence of post-failure events.