ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Nano to begin drilling next week in Illinois
It’s been a good month for Nano Nuclear in the state of Illinois. On October 7, the Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the company would be awarded $6.8 million from the Reimagining Energy and Vehicles in Illinois Act to help fund the development of its new regional research and development facility in the Chicago suburb of Oak Brook.
A. Delbrassine, L. Smith
Nuclear Technology | Volume 49 | Number 1 | June 1980 | Pages 129-135
Technical Paper | Nuclear Power Reactor Safety / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32514
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Mixed (U,Pu)C fuel pins of both pellet and sphere-pac designs have been irradiated in epithermal and fast fluxes. The results of postirradiation examination allow a limited comparison of the two designs to be made. Two experiments were performed, one in the Belgian Reactor 2 at Mol, Belgium and the other in the United Kingdom ’s Dounreay Fast Reactor. In each experiment the two fuel designs were coirradiated. Peak burnup of 7.7% was achieved at ratings up to 95 kW· m−1. In each experiment one of the pellet pins failed. Postirradiation examination revealed minor differences in the fuel pin behavior in regard to gas release, clad carburization, and plutonium movement. However, fuel restructuring and the pattern of pin strain were markedly different in the two designs and resulted in the failure of two of the pellet pins. The poorer performance of the pellet pins was due to the design—high bulk density fuel and large fuel clad gap.