ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DOE saves $1.7M transferring robotics from Portsmouth to Oak Ridge
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management said it has transferred four robotic demolition machines from the department’s Portsmouth Site in Ohio to Oak Ridge, Tenn., saving the office more than $1.7 million by avoiding the purchase of new equipment.
Robert Zboray, Wilhelmus J. M. de Kruijf, Tim H. J. J. van der Hagen, Hugo van Dam
Nuclear Technology | Volume 136 | Number 3 | December 2001 | Pages 301-314
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT01-A3247
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Linear stability analysis of a natural-circulation boiling water reactor (BWR) and the underlying thermal-hydraulic subsystem is performed using a reduced-order BWR dynamic model. The root-locus method is used to examine the stability of the system. The relation between the poles of the system and the physical processes causing the instabilities is investigated. For a natural-circulation thermal-hydraulic system, the two types of instabilities (type-I and type-II oscillations) can clearly be attributed to the dynamics of different types of pressure drops. However, it is not possible to associate these instability types with certain poles of the system.The root loci of a reactor with weak void reactivity feedback and those of the thermal-hydraulic system behave similarly: The same pole pair remains the least stable one as the operating conditions move from the type-I instability region to the type-II region. In the case of a reactor with strong void reactivity feedback, an exchange in the stability of two pole pairs is found: The least stable pole pair in the type-II region is not the same as in the type-I region.