ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
J. C. McGuire, W. F. Brehm
Nuclear Technology | Volume 48 | Number 2 | April 1980 | Pages 101-109
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32456
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Prototype radionuclide traps were tested in sodium loops containing irradiated sources (Source Term Control Loops 2 and 3) at 604 and 538°C (1120 and 1000°F). Prototype traps were 70 to 87% efficient in removing 54Mn from the sodium, and also effective for 60Co. Extensive screening tests showed that pure nickel is the most effective getter material, working best above 450°C (842°F) with increasing effectiveness at higher temperatures. Of the several possible trap sites considered for reactor use, a location within the top of the fuel assembly was chosen as the most convenient and effective. This position would facilitate trap handling by making trap insertion and removal an implicit part of the normal fuel handling procedure. A cost/benefit analysis shows that the radionuclide trap will be economically attractive. One radionuclide trap has completed a year of testing in an Experimental Breeder Reactor II driver fuel subassembly with good results, and a second trap is being tested in the same reactor.