ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
DOE nuclear cleanup costs, schedule delays continue to rise, GAO says
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management faces significant cost increases, schedule delays, and data management issues in completing nuclear waste cleanup projects, according to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
E. J. Allen, S. R. McNeany
Nuclear Technology | Volume 47 | Number 2 | February 1980 | Pages 363-377
Technical Paper | Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32439
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Assay and analysis procedures were developed for nondestructive fissile isotopic measurement of mixed 233U-235U fuel samples. For 233U, the number of delayed neutrons released per fission is about half that for 235U, although the number of prompt neutrons is approximately the same. By separately counting prompt and delayed neutrons released by a sample exposed to neutron irradiation, the amounts of 233U and 235U present in the sample can be determined. Equations of delayed and prompt neutron counts versus 233U and 235U contents are solved simultaneously for the 233U and 235U contents of a sample. Eleven samples containing mixtures of 233U and 235U from no 233U to nearly 100% were prepared and assayed in prompt and delayed neutron assay devices. Constants for calibration equations were fitted to data from nine of the samples. The maximum differences between counts calculated by the calibration equations and measured counts were 2.3% for delayed neutrons and 1.2% for prompt neutrons, indicating a good selection of the form for the calibration equations. The two remaining samples were treated as unknown, and the uranium contents of these samples were determined by simultaneously solving the two calibration equations. The maximum difference between measured 233U or 235U content and actual content for either sample was 1.5%.