ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
Jerzy Kubowski
Nuclear Technology | Volume 47 | Number 1 | January 1980 | Pages 59-69
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32412
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The dynamics model for fast transients analysis in the Polish research reactor Maria has been developed. The model includes, besides the point kinetic equations, the heat transfer and spatially dependent equations for calculating the temperature distribution in the average fuel channel. The space effects in the reactor core were taken into account by flux-weighted temperatures. The code TOTEM, for the CDC-CYBER 73 digital computer, was written in FORTRAN-EXTENDED. Detailed calculations allowed us to obtain the following dynamics parameters for the hot and poisoned reactor core: βeff = 0.00726 and l = 2.65 × 10−4 s. The temperature-dependent reactivity coefficients were used to calculate the feedback effects. To examine the applicability of the model, a series of rod drop experiments was performed, and the comparison of the calculated and measured excess reactivities has shown that the discrepancy does not exceed 2%.