ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
A. Segev, R. E. Henry, S. G. Bankoff
Nuclear Technology | Volume 46 | Number 3 | December 1979 | Pages 482-492
Technical Paper | Nuclear Power Reactor Safety / Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32356
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Shock tube experiments with a variety of liquids have been conducted in which large pressures were obtained for systems of water-Wood’s metal, butanol-Wood’s metal, and water-molten salt. With the water-Wood’s metal system, three separate regions were observed. When the hot liquid temperature was below 210°C (which can be identified as the spontaneous nucleation temperature), no thermal interaction occurred, and the cold liquid column only bounced if vapor were present initially (region A). When the hot liquid temperature was greater than the spontaneous nucleation temperature but the contact interface temperature was less than this value (region B), the low rate of vaporization resulted in bouncing of the liquid column, which in turn produced high pressures on the order of the theoretical “water hammer” pressure. Those hydrodynamic pressures are larger than the vapor pressure corresponding to the bulk temperature of the hot liquid and larger than the maximum pressure that may be generated from single-phase pressurization. The third region, observed when the hot liquid temperature was above the spontaneous nucleation temperature upon contact (region C), resulted in fast production of vapor and impulses larger than the theoretical impulse for stopping the liquid column. The mechanism for producing the high pressures in region C is a combination of hydrodynamic impact and thermal interaction. Since pressures produced in region C are also on the order of impact pressures, the only indication for thermal interaction is a considerable increase in the resulting impulse of pressure pulses with short rise time (<1.0 ms). When the initial pressure in the system was increased (by means of a thicker diaphragm), the bouncing behavior was suppressed. This was evident from the reduced number of bounces (if any at all), the low relative pressures and impulses, the temperature history, and the shape of pressure pulses. Experiments conducted with Freons and oils (mineral and silicon), which did not result in any explosive type of interaction, also fall in a high-pressure category and are in agreement with pouring experiments. As was shown in these experiments, the hydrodynamic effects may be very significant in any shock tube analyses, especially when multiple interactions are observed. However, this was not the case in the Wright et al. experiments, in which no bouncing was observed and the pressures generated on the first impact were much higher than the theoretical impact pressure. From mixing and heat transfer considerations, it is shown that a limited amount of hot liquid can transfer its energy to the cold liquid during the intermixing stage and produce the observed pressures.