ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Nano to begin drilling next week in Illinois
It’s been a good month for Nano Nuclear in the state of Illinois. On October 7, the Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the company would be awarded $6.8 million from the Reimagining Energy and Vehicles in Illinois Act to help fund the development of its new regional research and development facility in the Chicago suburb of Oak Brook.
Robert P. Wadkins, Richard G. Ambrosek, Michael W. Young
Nuclear Technology | Volume 46 | Number 3 | December 1979 | Pages 465-472
Technical Paper | Nuclear Power Reactor Safety / Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32354
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Critical heat flux (CHF) tests were performed at low pressure in a close-packed rod bundle. The electrically heated test bundle had geometrical configurations the same as those of the Power Burst Facility nuclear core. Existing low-pressure CHF correlations, namely, those of Bernath and Lund, did not correlate well with the test data. The Bernath correlation overpredicts CHF in some cases by a factor of 5 when compared with measured values. Lund’s correlation overpredicts CHF at measured CHF values above 1.5 MW/m2, and underpredicts CHF at measured CHF values below 1.5 MW/m2. These CHF tests provided the first close-packed rod bundle data with a sufficient data base to develop a correlation. The study examined CHF with absolute coolant system pressures of 117 to 255 kPa, mass velocities of 1992 to 4830 kg/s· m2, and subcooling of up to 53°C, with a rod spacing of 1.02 mm. The effect of rod bowing was examined with the rod spacing reduced in varying degrees to a minimum of 0.0508 mm. Motion pictures of the rod bundle during CHF with nominal spacing and bowed rods show that CHF occurs in the rod gap and does not propagate azimuthally on the rod surface. A CHF correlation developed from the test data correlates the data with a standard deviation of 8.79%.