ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Robert P. Wadkins, Richard G. Ambrosek, Michael W. Young
Nuclear Technology | Volume 46 | Number 3 | December 1979 | Pages 465-472
Technical Paper | Nuclear Power Reactor Safety / Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32354
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Critical heat flux (CHF) tests were performed at low pressure in a close-packed rod bundle. The electrically heated test bundle had geometrical configurations the same as those of the Power Burst Facility nuclear core. Existing low-pressure CHF correlations, namely, those of Bernath and Lund, did not correlate well with the test data. The Bernath correlation overpredicts CHF in some cases by a factor of 5 when compared with measured values. Lund’s correlation overpredicts CHF at measured CHF values above 1.5 MW/m2, and underpredicts CHF at measured CHF values below 1.5 MW/m2. These CHF tests provided the first close-packed rod bundle data with a sufficient data base to develop a correlation. The study examined CHF with absolute coolant system pressures of 117 to 255 kPa, mass velocities of 1992 to 4830 kg/s· m2, and subcooling of up to 53°C, with a rod spacing of 1.02 mm. The effect of rod bowing was examined with the rod spacing reduced in varying degrees to a minimum of 0.0508 mm. Motion pictures of the rod bundle during CHF with nominal spacing and bowed rods show that CHF occurs in the rod gap and does not propagate azimuthally on the rod surface. A CHF correlation developed from the test data correlates the data with a standard deviation of 8.79%.