ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
DOE nuclear cleanup costs, schedule delays continue to rise, GAO says
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management faces significant cost increases, schedule delays, and data management issues in completing nuclear waste cleanup projects, according to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
Kazys K. Almenas, Joseph M. Marchello
Nuclear Technology | Volume 41 | Number 3 | December 1978 | Pages 263-275
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT78-A32112
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effect of a mechanistic drop evaporation model on the pressure-temperature transient of a containment under loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) conditions has been investigated. To implement the model, the traditional two-node lumped parameter (atmosphere and sump) had to be expanded to encompass additional open thermodynamic systems. The calculations were compared against results obtained by a widely employed containment analysis code using the instantaneous evaporation model. The mechanistic drop evaporation model was found to produce higher peak pressures and substantially higher degrees of superheat for a steam line break LOCA. The dependence of pressure in both saturated and superheated air-steam atmospheres was generalized in terms of normalized pressure-energy derivatives. For superheated atmospheres, these derivatives were found to depend on the mode of energy removal. Two idealized energy removal modes were defined (purely condensing and purely noncondensing). The normalized pressure-energy derivatives for these mechanisms were found to differ by a factor of 2 to 3 for the parameter range of interest to containment analysis.