ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
J. Sejvar
Nuclear Technology | Volume 36 | Number 1 | November 1977 | Pages 48-55
Radiation Environments in Nuclear Reactor Power Plant | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31957
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Operating plant radiation level measurements are important in optimizing the operation of nuclear plant systems and in confirming methods and assumptions used by shield designers and must be evaluated to aid in improving future plant designs. In addition, the anticipated long-term radiation fields to which reactor components are subjected are an important consideration in materials selection and/or placement. Radiation level measurements obtained from various pressurized water reactor plants show a wide range of measured dose rates, both in certain areas of the plant (e.g., containment operating deck) and near various components. In some cases, the differences can be explained based on variations in plant layout and shielding configuration, extent of fuel cladding failures, etc., but in many cases, the reported values lack sufficient detail and appropriate explanatory information to correctly interpret the data. The measurements that have been accumulated and correlated thus far are being used to confirm the assumptions and models currently being employed by the shield designers and have led to system and equipment design improvements.