ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
R. L. Klueh, D. A. Canonico
Nuclear Technology | Volume 36 | Number 3 | December 1977 | Pages 353-367
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31949
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The creep-rupture properties of a cylindrical Type 304 stainless-steel forging weld overlaid with Type 308 stainless-steel weld metal were evaluated. Tests were made at 755, 811, and 866 K on tangential and radial (relative to the axis of the forging cylinder) specimens taken from the weld metal, from the forging as forged, and the forging adjacent to the weld metal/forging interface. Two types of axial specimens were also tested: specimens taken from the unaffected forging and specimens taken across the fusion line. These latter specimens contained both weld metal and forging in the specimen gauge section. At all temperatures, the rupture strength of the forging immediately adjacent to the fusion line was greater than that of the forging specimens taken at a distance from the fusion line. All forging specimens were stronger than the Type 308 stainless steel of the overlay weld metal. The only effect of orientation was found for the overlay weld metal, where the tangential specimens had a slightly greater rupture life than the radial specimens. (The minimum creep rates for the two orientations were similar.) At 811 and 866 K, the ductilities of the overlay weld metal continuously decreased with increased rupture life. A minimum was found for the ductility-rupture life relationship of the Type 304 stainless-steel forging specimens at 866 K, while at 811 K, the ductility continuously decreased with increased rupture life.