ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
DOE nuclear cleanup costs, schedule delays continue to rise, GAO says
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management faces significant cost increases, schedule delays, and data management issues in completing nuclear waste cleanup projects, according to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
E. E. Gruber
Nuclear Technology | Volume 35 | Number 3 | October 1977 | Pages 617-634
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31871
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The need for a capability to predict transient fission gas behavior arises because of the complexity of fission gas response to transient conditions, the importance of fission gas to fuel mechanical response, and the prevalent limitations on experimental information relevant to the problem. A detailed mechanistic analysis of intragranular swelling and release of gas from grains to grain boundaries, both as they result from transient heating, has been developed and incorporated in a fission gas release and swelling code (FRAS). A generalized parametric model to approximate the results that would be obtained from the more detailed calculations has also been developed. The need for this model arises from the necessity to consider the fission gas effects in more general multinode accident-analysis and pin-mechanics codes. For such calculations, the FRAS code is prohibitive in its demands on computer storage and execution time, while the parametric FRAS (PFRAS) code reduces these demands by an order of magnitude. Transient calculations have been carried out with both codes, both to illustrate the sensitivity of the results to the parameters and to indicate the level of confidence that can reasonably be ascribed to PFRAS results. The parameters considered include initial gas concentration, grain size, heating rate, thermal gradient, and pressure. The PFRAS model gives a satisfactory approximation to FRAS results for the broad range of parameters surveyed.