ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
J. T. Mihalczo, G. C. Tillett, D. L. Selby
Nuclear Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | September 1976 | Pages 422-433
Technical Paper | Uranium Resource / Instrument | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31655
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The modified source multiplication method was used to determine the reactivity from the count rate data as fuel assemblies were removed from the engineering mock-up core for the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). The count rate was monitored with a fission detector in the center of the core and in each of the three shield lobes [simulating the low-level flux monitor (LLFM)] as the ZPR-9 assembly was unloaded to simulate, in a reverse manner, the proposed initial loading to critical for the FFTF. Some conclusions from this interpretation are: 1. The inverse count rate from a fission counter in the center of the core is an excellent way to monitor the initial loading of the reactor. 2. The inverse count rates from each of the LLFMs are not adequate for monitoring the initial loading, since they were not a smooth function of the number of fuel assemblies loaded even after correction for changes in detection efficiency. 3. The reactivity versus fuel loading (obtained from the interpretation of the inverse count rate data from the LLFM detectors using an inverse kinetics rod-drop calibration at 0.8 dollar sub-critical) was not a smooth function of the fuel loading because of difficulties in calculating the required changes in detection efficiency for detectors in the shield. However, a similar interpretation for the in-core detector showed a smooth dependence of reactivity on fuel loading. 4. The reference asymmetric loading pattern for startup does not present any interpretational difficulties with a detector in the core, and, thus, the symmetric loading pattern has no real advantages with an in-core detector and requires more time. 5. The initial startup of the FFTF should be monitored with an in-core detector. These conclusions are consistent with those obtained with the prototype fast reactor in the United Kingdom (with its in-core detector) and with the Phenix reactor in France (with its detector outside the core).