ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
J. T. Mihalczo, G. C. Tillett, D. L. Selby
Nuclear Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | September 1976 | Pages 422-433
Technical Paper | Uranium Resource / Instrument | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31655
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The modified source multiplication method was used to determine the reactivity from the count rate data as fuel assemblies were removed from the engineering mock-up core for the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). The count rate was monitored with a fission detector in the center of the core and in each of the three shield lobes [simulating the low-level flux monitor (LLFM)] as the ZPR-9 assembly was unloaded to simulate, in a reverse manner, the proposed initial loading to critical for the FFTF. Some conclusions from this interpretation are: 1. The inverse count rate from a fission counter in the center of the core is an excellent way to monitor the initial loading of the reactor. 2. The inverse count rates from each of the LLFMs are not adequate for monitoring the initial loading, since they were not a smooth function of the number of fuel assemblies loaded even after correction for changes in detection efficiency. 3. The reactivity versus fuel loading (obtained from the interpretation of the inverse count rate data from the LLFM detectors using an inverse kinetics rod-drop calibration at 0.8 dollar sub-critical) was not a smooth function of the fuel loading because of difficulties in calculating the required changes in detection efficiency for detectors in the shield. However, a similar interpretation for the in-core detector showed a smooth dependence of reactivity on fuel loading. 4. The reference asymmetric loading pattern for startup does not present any interpretational difficulties with a detector in the core, and, thus, the symmetric loading pattern has no real advantages with an in-core detector and requires more time. 5. The initial startup of the FFTF should be monitored with an in-core detector. These conclusions are consistent with those obtained with the prototype fast reactor in the United Kingdom (with its in-core detector) and with the Phenix reactor in France (with its detector outside the core).