ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
IAEA again raises global nuclear power projections
Noting recent momentum behind nuclear power, the International Atomic Energy Agency has revised up its projections for the expansion of nuclear power, estimating that global nuclear operational capacity will more than double by 2050—reaching 2.6 times the 2024 level—with small modular reactors expected to play a pivotal role in this high-case scenario.
IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi announced the new projections, contained in the annual report Energy, Electricity, and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050 at the 69th IAEA General Conference in Vienna.
In the report’s high-case scenario, nuclear electrical generating capacity is projected to increase to from 377 GW at the end of 2024 to 992 GW by 2050. In a low-case scenario, capacity rises 50 percent, compared with 2024, to 561 GW. SMRs are projected to account for 24 percent of the new capacity added in the high case and for 5 percent in the low case.
Douglas C. Hunt, Deanne Dickinson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 30 | Number 2 | August 1976 | Pages 190-214
Technical Paper | Criticality Array Data and Calculational Method / Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31615
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The , albedo, interaction potential, weighted interaction Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant solid-angle, s/v surface density, fraction critical surface density, and equilateral hyperbola methods are compared by attempting to apply them to 14 different example arrays. The example arrays are distinguished by the type of fissile material in the array units and by the number of units in each array. Arrays with units of Pu(95) metal, U(93) metal, damp U(93)O2, dry Pu(95)O2, U(93)O2(NO3)2 solution, Pu(95)(NO3)4 solution, or U(5)O2F2 solution are considered. It is concluded that if the user has access to a Monte Carlo code such as KENO, he is better off using it than any of the other models for criticality evaluations of specific problems. The remainder of the models are most useful in establishing possible designs for a fissile storage or processing facility. The albedo method is found to be the preferred solid-angle technique, while the s/v surface density method and the method are the most comprehensive and useful of the semiempirical techniques. The s/v method is easier to apply and covers more possible contingencies (e.g., array flooding or persons in arrays), while the method is more difficult to use but has added flexibility, broader applicability, and yields more analytical scaling relations between array parameters.