ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Hot Fuel Examination Facility named a Nuclear Historic Landmark
The American Nuclear Society recently announced the designation of three new nuclear historic landmarks: the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), the Neely Nuclear Research Center, and the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant. Today’s article, the first in a three-part series, will focus on the historical significance of HFEF.
D. Guarino, V. Marinelli, L. Pastori
Nuclear Technology | Volume 23 | Number 1 | July 1974 | Pages 38-52
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31432
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Most published steady-state burnout experimental data on BWR square geometry rod bundles at 70 kg/cm2 were analyzed and compared with the main calculation methods, in order to examine the state-of-the-art in burnout power predictions. The calculations were performed using two system parameter correlations—Barnett and Macbeth, a local condition correlation—Becker, and two hydrodynamic condition correlations—CISE-III and ACHAB. Furthermore, a selected number of representative cases were calculated by means of LEUCIPPO and COBRA-II subchannel codes, in which the Becker correlations for annuli and round tubes were applied to the peripheral and central subchannels, respectively. The comparisons showed that Becker and ACHAB methods predict the burnout powers with rms errors lower than 10%, while the subchannel analysis (applied neglecting the void drift) yields errors of 20 to 25%.