ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
D. Guarino, V. Marinelli, L. Pastori
Nuclear Technology | Volume 23 | Number 1 | July 1974 | Pages 38-52
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31432
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Most published steady-state burnout experimental data on BWR square geometry rod bundles at 70 kg/cm2 were analyzed and compared with the main calculation methods, in order to examine the state-of-the-art in burnout power predictions. The calculations were performed using two system parameter correlations—Barnett and Macbeth, a local condition correlation—Becker, and two hydrodynamic condition correlations—CISE-III and ACHAB. Furthermore, a selected number of representative cases were calculated by means of LEUCIPPO and COBRA-II subchannel codes, in which the Becker correlations for annuli and round tubes were applied to the peripheral and central subchannels, respectively. The comparisons showed that Becker and ACHAB methods predict the burnout powers with rms errors lower than 10%, while the subchannel analysis (applied neglecting the void drift) yields errors of 20 to 25%.