ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Wright officially sworn in for third term at the NRC
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission recently announced that David Wright, after being nominated by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate, was ceremonially sworn in as NRC chair on September 8.
This swearing in comes more than a month after Wright began his third term on the commission; he began leading as chair July 31. His term will conclude on June 30, 2030.
Raymond J. Webb, James C. Brittingham
Nuclear Technology | Volume 132 | Number 2 | November 2000 | Pages 206-213
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3139
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Lagrange Multiplier method was tested to determine its capability for replacing the current Combustion Engineering Core (CECOR) method for estimating the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station reactor power distributions.The Lagrange Multiplier method involves minimizing the sum of the squared residuals of 241 coupling equations subject to 61 constraint equations. The CECOR method solves 180 (241 - 61) coupling equations subject to the 61 constraint equations. The Lagrange method is more complex because it includes the 61 additional coupling equations.The "consistency test" was used to test the accuracy of both methods for computing the power in uninstrumented assemblies, i.e., one-by-one, each of the detectors is considered not available, and the remaining detectors are used to compute the powers in the uninstrumented assemblies.There is potential for expanding the Lagrange method to a three-dimensional approach that could produce even better results, and that is a consideration.