ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Sellafield awards $3.86B in infrastructure contracts to three companies
Sellafield Ltd., the site license company overseeing the decommissioning of the U.K.’s Sellafield nuclear site in Cumbria, England, announced the award of £2.9 billion (about $3.86 billion) in infrastructure support contracts to the companies of Morgan Sindall Infrastructure, Costain, and HOCHTIEF (UK) Construction.
Raymond J. Webb, James C. Brittingham
Nuclear Technology | Volume 132 | Number 2 | November 2000 | Pages 206-213
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3139
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Lagrange Multiplier method was tested to determine its capability for replacing the current Combustion Engineering Core (CECOR) method for estimating the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station reactor power distributions.The Lagrange Multiplier method involves minimizing the sum of the squared residuals of 241 coupling equations subject to 61 constraint equations. The CECOR method solves 180 (241 - 61) coupling equations subject to the 61 constraint equations. The Lagrange method is more complex because it includes the 61 additional coupling equations.The "consistency test" was used to test the accuracy of both methods for computing the power in uninstrumented assemblies, i.e., one-by-one, each of the detectors is considered not available, and the remaining detectors are used to compute the powers in the uninstrumented assemblies.There is potential for expanding the Lagrange method to a three-dimensional approach that could produce even better results, and that is a consideration.