ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
Stephen A. McGuire, José G. Martín
Nuclear Technology | Volume 18 | Number 3 | June 1973 | Pages 257-266
Technical Paper | Economic | doi.org/10.13182/NT73-A31299
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the past, the electric utility companies have been able to ignore inflation rates of ∼1.6%/yr in their planning because technological improvements managed to maintain a gap of ∼1% between the rates of increase of the consumer price index and the cost of electricity. This stability in the price of electricity is not likely to continue; for the years 1968 through 1971 the inflation rate averaged 5.0%/yr, the cost of petroleum rose 3.2%/yr, and the cost of coal increased by 16.0%/yr, causing large increases in utility costs. Drawing from conventional economics and the experience of other countries with a long history of inflation, the present paper shows the effect of expected fuel, operation, and maintenance cost escalation on the price of electricity and on the relative competitiveness of nuclear and fossil-fuel plants. A self-consistent mode of cost computation using a “monetary correction” to account for inflation shows that, in relation to fossil-fuel electric power, nuclear power is ∼15% more economical than most conventional comparisons indicate. The implications are important for the establishment of a national energy policy and have repercussions in other capital-intensive schemes.