ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
Stephen A. McGuire, José G. Martín
Nuclear Technology | Volume 18 | Number 3 | June 1973 | Pages 257-266
Technical Paper | Economic | doi.org/10.13182/NT73-A31299
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the past, the electric utility companies have been able to ignore inflation rates of ∼1.6%/yr in their planning because technological improvements managed to maintain a gap of ∼1% between the rates of increase of the consumer price index and the cost of electricity. This stability in the price of electricity is not likely to continue; for the years 1968 through 1971 the inflation rate averaged 5.0%/yr, the cost of petroleum rose 3.2%/yr, and the cost of coal increased by 16.0%/yr, causing large increases in utility costs. Drawing from conventional economics and the experience of other countries with a long history of inflation, the present paper shows the effect of expected fuel, operation, and maintenance cost escalation on the price of electricity and on the relative competitiveness of nuclear and fossil-fuel plants. A self-consistent mode of cost computation using a “monetary correction” to account for inflation shows that, in relation to fossil-fuel electric power, nuclear power is ∼15% more economical than most conventional comparisons indicate. The implications are important for the establishment of a national energy policy and have repercussions in other capital-intensive schemes.