ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Leading the charge: INL’s role in advancing HALEU production
Idaho National Laboratory is playing a key role in helping the U.S. Department of Energy meet near-term needs by recovering HALEU from federal inventories, providing critical support to help lay the foundation for a future commercial HALEU supply chain. INL also supports coordination of broader DOE efforts, from material recovery at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina to commercial enrichment initiatives.
K. U. Ahmed, R. G. Cochran
Nuclear Technology | Volume 17 | Number 1 | January 1973 | Pages 66-70
Technical Paper | Radiation | doi.org/10.13182/NT73-A31255
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Total gamma-ray attenuation coefficients for five different elements were measured for energies 6.02-, 7.28-, 7.72-, 8.49-, 9.3-, and 9.88-MeV gamma rays. The nuclear resonance scattering method was used in the attenuation of photons for the two energies, 7.28 and 8.49 MeV. For the other energies the direct narrow beam method was used. The total attenuation coefficients were measured with an average uncertainty of 0.6% and appeared to be in better agreement with the tabulated values of Hubbel and Berger than those of Storm and Israel.
