ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
S. J. Milioti, A. Sherman, R. L. Ritzman, J. A. Gieseke
Nuclear Technology | Volume 16 | Number 3 | December 1972 | Pages 497-508
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT72-A31218
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A computerized mathematical model has been developed which treats the process of iodine removal from the atmosphere of a multivolume nuclear reactor containment by aqueous sprays under simulated accident conditions. The model is an extension of an earlier work and consists of a set of simultaneous linear first-order differential equations that are solved time incrementally. The rate coefficients are calculated internally and take into account the effects of spray solution chemistry, liquid phase mass transfer resistance, system temperature, spray drop coalescence, spray coverage, spray impingement on internal obstructions, and spray solution recirculation. Results of parameter variation studies with the model reveal that liquid phase mass transfer resistance effects are more important than spray loss mechanisms in controlling iodine removal rates. Comparison of computed predictions with results of experimental spray studies shows close agreement with respect to initial iodine removal rates.