ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
ANS, UCOR sign MOU for workforce development program
The American Nuclear Society and United Cleanup Oak Ridge have signed a memorandum of understanding that establishes a framework for collaboration to advance ANS workforce training and certification programs serving the nuclear industry.
According to the document, UCOR will provide “operational insights and subject matter expertise to inform ANS’s professional development and credentialing offerings, including the Certified Nuclear Professional [CNP] program.” The collaboration will strengthen UCOR’s workforce development efforts while advancing ANS’s mission to sustain and expand the national nuclear workforce pipeline and capabilities.
J. O. Cermak, R. H. Leyse, D. P. Dominicis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 4 | August 1971 | Pages 557-562
Technical Paper | Symposium on Fuel Rod Failure and Its Effect / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30853
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effects of flow blockage on bottom-cooling heat transfer effectiveness were studied in the PWR-FLECHT program. Blockages of 50 and 75% of the flow area of a 5 × 5 array in the center of a 7 × 7 rod bundle were studied with 12-ft-long heater rods with an axial cosine heat generation distribution of 1.66 peak-to-average and decay-heat simulation. The test section consists of 42 heated rods (fuel rods) and 7 non-heated tubes (control rod thimbles). Flow blockage is effected by a -in.-thick flat plate mounted at the peak heat generation location (6-ft elevation) with the heater rod thermocouples being located ∼1 in. downstream from the flow blockage plate. The results of a flooding rate of 6 in./sec showed the maximum temperature rise in the heater rod was the same for 0, 50, and 75% flow blockage. Lower flooding rates of 4- and 2-in./sec showed higher temperature rises in the heater rod for the 0% flow blockage case than for the 75% flow blockage case. These flow blockage tests demonstrate that bottom-flooding heat transfer effectiveness is not impaired with the flow blockage configurations tested. Further tests are planned at flow area blockages of 90%.