ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
J. O. Cermak, R. H. Leyse, D. P. Dominicis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 4 | August 1971 | Pages 557-562
Technical Paper | Symposium on Fuel Rod Failure and Its Effect / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30853
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effects of flow blockage on bottom-cooling heat transfer effectiveness were studied in the PWR-FLECHT program. Blockages of 50 and 75% of the flow area of a 5 × 5 array in the center of a 7 × 7 rod bundle were studied with 12-ft-long heater rods with an axial cosine heat generation distribution of 1.66 peak-to-average and decay-heat simulation. The test section consists of 42 heated rods (fuel rods) and 7 non-heated tubes (control rod thimbles). Flow blockage is effected by a -in.-thick flat plate mounted at the peak heat generation location (6-ft elevation) with the heater rod thermocouples being located ∼1 in. downstream from the flow blockage plate. The results of a flooding rate of 6 in./sec showed the maximum temperature rise in the heater rod was the same for 0, 50, and 75% flow blockage. Lower flooding rates of 4- and 2-in./sec showed higher temperature rises in the heater rod for the 0% flow blockage case than for the 75% flow blockage case. These flow blockage tests demonstrate that bottom-flooding heat transfer effectiveness is not impaired with the flow blockage configurations tested. Further tests are planned at flow area blockages of 90%.