ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Hatice Akkurt, Naeem M. Abdurrahman
Nuclear Technology | Volume 127 | Number 3 | September 1999 | Pages 301-314
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A3003
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In 1967, a series of critical experiments were conducted at the Westinghouse Reactor Evaluation Center under the joint sponsorship of the Empire State Atomic Development Associates (ESADA) and Westinghouse using mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel. During the experimental program, both single- and multiregion critical core configurations were constructed for different fuel types and lattice pitches. Two types of MOX fuels and a low-enriched UO2 fuel were used. A description of selected single-region ESADA experiments with criticality benchmark calculation results for those experiments as well as sensitivity analysis results on some configurations is given. Criticality calculations were performed using MCNP-4A with both ENDF/B-V and ENDF-B/VI cross-section libraries. The calculational results show that the calculated eigenvalues with ENDF/B-V cross-section libraries are higher than calculated eigenvalues with ENDF/B-VI cross-section libraries for all types of fuel. Calculational results also indicate that there is an increase in keff with increasing lattice pitch with both cross-section libraries. The uncertainties in keff value due to some uncertainties in the measured data are also calculated.