ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Jean-Paul Deffain, Philippe Alexandre, Paul Thomet
Nuclear Technology | Volume 127 | Number 3 | September 1999 | Pages 267-286
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A3001
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This feasibility study on core control using only the control rods is conducted with the TOPAZE algorithm - implemented in the CRONOS2 core calculation code - in its two versions: version 1 (minimization of the two-dimensional peak, imposed axial offset) and version 2 (minimization extended to three-dimensional, without imposed axial offset). The sensitivity analysis on the power peaks was carried out on the variations of the axial height of the burnable poisons and the type of grey or black control rod clusters. It is demonstrated that the reduction in the number of rod cluster controls allows a correct smoothing of the reactivity over the whole cycle, except for the end of cycle when control rods are moved upward.For load follow feasibility studies, several approaches, based on simulations performed with MISRITME have been evaluated: variation of the primary flow rate for axial offset control; use of a program, with temperature decreasing with the power; and finally, coupling of a temperature range, centered on a reference temperature with a negative gradient, to the French N4 reactor control mode Dispositif de Manoeuvrabilité Accrue: X (DMAX). It is shown that the return to equilibrium following a low threshold of 40% induces an additional penalty between 15 and 20% on the power peak. Solutions are suggested to globally reduce these peaks, which appear during all operating conditions.Two types of reactivity-induced accidents linked to clusters are studied: the removal of a rod cluster control assembly (RCCA) at full power (class III) and the ejection of a RCCA (class IV). It is also shown that ejection at zero power, with a released reactivity of 1.86 $, does not cause major damage to cladding and fuel. However, at full power, with the assumptions made, a partial melting of the pellet occurs without however creating fuel dispersion in the coolant.