ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Anastasios Mironidis, Leon Lidofsky, George Grochowski, Lefteris Tsoukalas
Nuclear Technology | Volume 127 | Number 2 | August 1999 | Pages 170-185
Technical Paper | Reactor Operations and Control | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2993
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The problem of core damage severity evaluation during a core-threatening accident of a pressurized water reactor is addressed. An expert system, Core Damage Evaluator (CoDE), is developed that makes an adept utilization of the inferring capabilities of fuzzy logic to classify the core in the damage severity category: "intact," "clad failure," or "core melt" or a combination of the last two. If it is determined that some form of core damage exists, the logic model enters a quantification stage to provide a numerical assessment of the damage.The model is provided with two row vector inputs at a rate of 100 to 150 vector pairs per minute. The qualitative vector consists of 69 elements, whereas the quantitative one contains 83. These elements constitute instantaneous physical parameter values provided by the plant instrumentation. The inferencing procedure employed in this problem is the generalized modus ponens (GMP), which has its origin in the field of approximate reasoning.