ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Chien-Hsiung Lee, I-Ming Huang, Chin-Jang Chang, Tay-Jian Liu, Yuh-Ming Ferng
Nuclear Technology | Volume 126 | Number 1 | April 1999 | Pages 48-61
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2957
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The RELAP5/MOD3.2 code is used at the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research Integral System Test Facility to analyze a 2% cold-leg-break experiment that includes failure of the high-pressure injection system. The assessment code predictions include primary pressure, inventory distribution in the reactor coolant system (RCS), loop flow rate, break flow rate, and core thermal hydraulics. A comparison between the calculated results and the experimental data shows (a) a good match with the predictions of the RCS pressure and hot- and cold-leg fluid temperatures, (b) underprediction of the core and downcomer levels, (c) overprediction of the loop flow rates in single- and two-phase natural circulation, and (d) inadequate prediction of asymmetric coolant holdup in the three steam generators. Also presented are sensitivity studies of choked flow associated with the defaulted values of discharge coefficients in the simulation of the break flow, and of the core bypass area to evaluate the effect of core level depression.