ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Chris Wagner: The role of Eden Radioisotopes in the future of nuclear medicine
Chris Wagner has more than 40 years of experience in nuclear medicine, beginning as a clinical practitioner before moving into leadership roles at companies like Mallinckrodt (now Curium) and Nordion. His knowledge of both the clinical and the manufacturing sides of nuclear medicine laid the groundwork for helping to found Eden Radioisotopes, a start-up venture that intends to make diagnostic and therapeutic raw material medical isotopes like molybdenum-99 and lutetium-177.
Chien-Hsiung Lee, I-Ming Huang, Chin-Jang Chang, Tay-Jian Liu, Yuh-Ming Ferng
Nuclear Technology | Volume 126 | Number 1 | April 1999 | Pages 48-61
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2957
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The RELAP5/MOD3.2 code is used at the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research Integral System Test Facility to analyze a 2% cold-leg-break experiment that includes failure of the high-pressure injection system. The assessment code predictions include primary pressure, inventory distribution in the reactor coolant system (RCS), loop flow rate, break flow rate, and core thermal hydraulics. A comparison between the calculated results and the experimental data shows (a) a good match with the predictions of the RCS pressure and hot- and cold-leg fluid temperatures, (b) underprediction of the core and downcomer levels, (c) overprediction of the loop flow rates in single- and two-phase natural circulation, and (d) inadequate prediction of asymmetric coolant holdup in the three steam generators. Also presented are sensitivity studies of choked flow associated with the defaulted values of discharge coefficients in the simulation of the break flow, and of the core bypass area to evaluate the effect of core level depression.