ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
NRC approves V.C. Summer’s second license renewal
Dominion Energy’s V.C. Summer nuclear power plant, in Jenkinsville, S.C., has been authorized to operate for 80 years, until August 2062, following the renewal of its operating license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a second time.
Chi H. Kang, Dale B. Lancaster
Nuclear Technology | Volume 125 | Number 3 | March 1999 | Pages 292-304
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2948
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A flat, uniform axial burnup assumption, preferred for its computational simplicity, does not always conservatively estimate the pressurized water reactor spent-fuel-cask multiplication factors. Rather, the reactivity effect of the significantly underburned fuel ends, usually referred to as the "end effect," can be properly treated by explicit modeling of the axial burnup distribution based on limiting axial burnup profiles. An alternative approach to this laborious explicit modeling is to augment the multiplication factor determined from an axially uniform calculation by an appropriate keff bias. Based on the observation that the end effect increases with a decrease in the cask size, conservative keff bias curves are determined by applying the limiting axial burnup profiles and assuming a single-assembly cask configuration. However, because of their conservative nature, the keff bias curves are not recommended unless there is a large reactivity margin in the particular cask of interest.The horizontal burnup distribution poses less reactivity concern simply because the limiting arrangement in a cask is an unlikely event. The possibility of two or more assemblies with low burnup zones placed inward and next to each other is small, while the underburned fuel ends will surely be next to each other. Regardless, the reactivity effect of the horizontal burnup distribution is bounded by assuming a conservative horizontal burnup gradient within individual assemblies and the most reactive arrangement of multiple assemblies in spent nuclear fuel casks. This approach can have a significant effect on small cask designs where the orientation of fuel assemblies has a substantial influence on the calculated multiplication factor because of the large radial neutron leakage.