ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
J. A. Baran, R. S. Reynolds, R. E. Faw, W. R. Kimel
Nuclear Technology | Volume 9 | Number 4 | October 1970 | Pages 591-604
Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28769
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method of calibrating a lead-collimated, sodium iodide scintillation spectrometer is reported. Nine radioisotopes with gamma-ray energies in the range from 0.046 to 1.114 MeV were used. Details of the methods of data acquisition and reduction are presented. Methods are described for using response functions from the nine radioisotopes to generate response matrices for the energy range from 20 to 1200 keV. Techniques for unfolding experimental data using response matrices are compared, and a detailed error analysis is presented. For the routine analysis of experimental data using direct matrix inversion, a 25 × 25 response matrix with unequally spaced energy intervals over the range 20 to 1200 keV was found to be near optimum.