ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
ANS, UCOR sign MOU for workforce development program
The American Nuclear Society and United Cleanup Oak Ridge have signed a memorandum of understanding that establishes a framework for collaboration to advance ANS workforce training and certification programs serving the nuclear industry.
According to the document, UCOR will provide “operational insights and subject matter expertise to inform ANS’s professional development and credentialing offerings, including the Certified Nuclear Professional [CNP] program.” The collaboration will strengthen UCOR’s workforce development efforts while advancing ANS’s mission to sustain and expand the national nuclear workforce pipeline and capabilities.
C. A. Flanagan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 9 | Number 5 | November 1970 | Pages 640-650
Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28738
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The physics performance of Shippingport Core 2 operations from initial start-up of the first seed through initial power operations on the second seed is summarized. The emphasis is on comparison of observed results with calculated results to identify the ability of current calculational techniques to describe core operations. Also included are selected comparisons of results of isotopic examination programs performed on Core 1 seed and blanket fuel assemblies. The comparisons indicate that critical core configurations are described with varying degrees of success with reactivity deviations generally <1% δ p. Power distributions agree reasonably well with measured values. Results of destructive analysis programs indicate that both gross and local fuel depletion are calculated to within 5 to 10%.