ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
Hash Hashemian: Visionary leadership
As Dr. Hashem M. “Hash” Hashemian prepares to step into his term as President of the American Nuclear Society, he is clear that he wants to make the most of this unique moment.
A groundswell in public approval of nuclear is finding a home in growing governmental support that is backed by a tailwind of technological innovation. “Now is a good time to be in nuclear,” Hashemian said, as he explained the criticality of this moment and what he hoped to accomplish as president.
Charles J. Mueller, Stephen M. Folga, Jordi Roglans-Ribas, Bassel Nabelssi, Jofu Mishima
Nuclear Technology | Volume 122 | Number 3 | June 1998 | Pages 306-317
Technical Paper | Criticality of Nuclear Materials | doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2872
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Guidance from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for the performance of accident analysis in support of environmental impact assessments calls for a graded approach that considers frequencies as well as consequences of accidents, focuses on high-risk scenarios, and avoids bounding analyses that can obfuscate comparisons of alternative actions. This guidance reflects the fact that at the heart of an environmental impact statement is a comparative analysis of alternatives, including the proposed action; this analysis should address the environmental impacts in proportion to their potential significance, avoid addressing insignificant impacts in detail, and focus analysis resources to be as cost-effective as possible. Accordingly, a probabilistic risk analysis-based methodology to satisfy DOE guidance was developed and implemented for the DOE Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (WM PEIS). The methods are described and illustrated, and an outline of the computational framework is presented. This methodology, although developed for the WM PEIS, is, of course, applicable to general safety analyses. The implementation of the methods for the WM PEIS is summarized, and the extension of the methods to site-specific applications is explained.