ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Sellafield awards $3.86B in infrastructure contracts to three companies
Sellafield Ltd., the site license company overseeing the decommissioning of the U.K.’s Sellafield nuclear site in Cumbria, England, announced the award of £2.9 billion (about $3.86 billion) in infrastructure support contracts to the companies of Morgan Sindall Infrastructure, Costain, and HOCHTIEF (UK) Construction.
H. O. Schad, A. A. Bishop
Nuclear Technology | Volume 8 | Number 3 | March 1970 | Pages 261-275
Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28673
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were conducted to determine the behavior of stationary gas bubbles in narrow liquid-filled gaps. The work was carried out to help answer the question of how fission gas bubbles may behave in the sodium bond of oxide and carbide fueled rods. The hydraulic data obtained with uncracked pellets indicate that stagnant bubbles may exist even when the simulated fuel rod was vibrated. These stagnant bubbles are large enough to cause calculated hot spots in the bond. The location under an overhanging ledge formed by axial eccentric pellets was a common place for bubbles to stagnate. Possible differences between the actual fuel-rod behavior in the reactor and the test conditions may be caused by heating effects which influence bubble motion, cracked pellets which prevent accumulation of fission gas in the bonding, and the release of significant amounts of fission gas only when the reactor is shut down. Equations are presented for the maximum bubble size, and the length and width of bubbles stagnated at the lips (overhang) of fuel pellets.