ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Researchers use one-of-a-kind expertise and capabilities to test fuels of tomorrow
At the Idaho National Laboratory Hot Fuel Examination Facility, containment box operator Jake Maupin moves a manipulator arm into position around a pencil-thin nuclear fuel rod. He is preparing for a procedure that he and his colleagues have practiced repeatedly in anticipation of this moment in the hot cell.
L. F. Parsly
Nuclear Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | January 1970 | Pages 13-22
Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28629
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The removal of methyl iodide from containment atmospheres by reactive sprays proceeds by a simultaneous process of absorption and chemical reaction. A theoretical development is presented to show how the relative values of reaction time and other time constants of the system determine the rate-controlling process. Theoretical predictions are compared with the results of 12 experiment So For the fast-reaction case (when the reaction time is equal to or less than the fall time of the drops), the calculated removal half-times averaged 2.25 times the observed. The reasons for the difference are identified and appear to be due to erroneous equilibrium data, neglect of internal circulation in the calculation, and neglect of wall effects. A reduction factor of at least 2.0 in the 2-h dose due to methyl iodide appears readily attainable.